Reading

Every Book I Read in 2015 (So Far)

I have been keeping a written record of everything I read since I was 15 or 16. For a long time it was in a fat little blue suede journal, which seems to have gotten lost the last time we moved.  I’ve been keeping a note on my phone since then, and today I moved it over to the List app. My list can be found here.

(Looking back at the year so far I can see this list is a parade of a very specific sort of trendy “literary fiction” novels and you can probably extrapolate from it *exactly* which book blogs I read.  Blech, what a snooze. Tell me the weird and unexpected and great things you’ve read lately, please.)

Standard
Reading

Gatsby Gets Paid


daisy_great gatsby
The Great Gatsby
 is a beautiful book. It’s also is the professed favorite book of a lot of people who don’t really read books. They read it once in high school and it was glamorous and stylish and cool. And after all it sounds better than saying your favorite book is “The Da Vinci Code.” (I mean, if your favorite book is The Da Vinci Code, just own it. It’s cool.)

Now the people who have only read The Great Gatsby once, if ever, are running an immense PR machine that reaches from diamond headbands to “Gatsby’s Girl” tank tops (talk about missing the point) to a soundtrack featuring Jay-Z and Lana Del Rey. The movie is not even out in wide release yet, but there are tie-ins that range from Daisy’s headpiece ($200,000 at Tiffany’s) and stockings ($110) to the Trump Hotel Gatsby package ($14,999, including an Art Deco shagreen cuff and “personal note from Ivanka Trump”).

So we’ve arrived at a dark and kind of hilariously off-the-mark new notion of Gatsby: a lot of people missed the point of this book about the decay underneath the excess and glamour of the 1920s, and now it’s being used to sell us stuff. Look, buy Daisy’s diamonds! Buy Gatsby’s shirts! Party like it’s 1922!

Gatsby has earned its place as a great American novel not because it’s about a self-made man, but because it’s a book about stuff.  It’s about cars and shirts and white dresses and expensive real estate and swimming pools. It’s about a woman, who is merely an avatar for more stuff. F. Scott Fitzgerald called himself a “moralist at heart,” and if The Great Gatsby can be said to have a moral it may be thou shalt not covet.  It’s a book about how how covetousness–not love, not even lust–is poisonous. It’s a book about how trying to impress the wrong people for the wrong reasons will fuck you every time.

The most boring people in the world are the ones who talk  about rich people as though being rich can make you interesting, the people who can devote whole conversations to other people’s real estate and other people’s yachts and cars and trophy wives. A lot of the time they’re not even talking about their own stuff (a subject boring in its own right), they’re talking about other people as though they are fascinating, simply because they have more stuff than you and me.

James Gatz would have been one of these people, the guy who returns from a company outing at his boss’s country club and wants to tell you all about the Bentleys and Porsches in the parking lot, the filets in the dining room, the golf pro who’s just off the PGA. He’d have been the one who talks about cars and boats incessantly, who runs up a gigantic credit card bill getting bottle service so he can look like a baller. The one who will do anything to bag a girl who is manicured and waxed and toned; not because he wants her, but because he can’t afford her.

Like Gatsby, we’ll do whatever it takes to tell people we can afford more stuff–even when we really can’t, perhaps especially when we can’t. There will be time to get out of debt later, because right now what matters is letting people know that you have arrived, that you afford the right address and the right car and the right schools. It doesn’t matter if you can afford it, as long as people think you can. And there’s the twisted, nasty heart of the Gatsby tie-ins: no one can afford them. We just get to look, clicking through photo slideshows on the Internet and listening to the breathless prattle of morning show hosts, thinking about what it would be like to be the type of person who can drop 15K on a hotel suite. We only get to look at the pictures: look, and covet.

The Great Gatsby is not a great American novel because it has jazz and flappers and cars, or even because it’s possibly the most beautiful and polished piece of prose written in the 20th century. It’s a great American novel because it’s about American people: the people who always want what we can’t afford, and rarely let that stop us.

Photo via thefashionmedley.com 

 

Standard
English, Reading

Our e-readers, ourselves

Literary world golden-boy Jonathan Franzen this week told reporters that he doesn’t just hate e-books, he think they’re downright evil.

“The technology I like is the American paperback edition of Freedom. I can spill water on it and it would still work! So it’s pretty good technology. And what’s more, it will work great 10 years from now. So no wonder the capitalists hate it. It’s a bad business model.”  

via HuffPo

I’m going to have to beg to differ. Personally, I was leery of e-readers when they first came out–I wasn’t interested in anything that was going to supplant solid, comforting paper and ink books. I got a Kindle before studying abroad, and I have to admit, I pretty much fell in love. With my Kindle, I was able to get The Boston Globe in Madrid, London or Istanbul–in seconds. If I ran out of things to read while waiting in an airport, I could download a new book instantly. Plus, the best feature is that I could take the fifteen or twenty books and magazines I read over the course of the trip along with me in a single small device. It genuinely has made a big change to the way I get my reading material.

But I still buy books. A lot of them. I have so many books I feel like they just sometimes just manifest on my shelves even when I don’t buy them.

If I want something that I know is going to be an instant gratification, probably-never-read-again kind of book, like a trashy romance for the beach or a humor book that I’ll read in one sitting, then I’m likely to get it on my Kindle. It’s cheaper, and it doesn’t take up any space on the shelf. Books haven’t lost any of their magic, though, especially a beautifully designed, quality book that I know is going to be part of my library for life. Plus, real books have a quality that e-books don’t. It’s kind of like trying on clothes in a store. (Did you know you’re more likely to buy something if you try it on? It’s science.) When I can pick up a book in a store and flip through it organically, see the cover, feel it in my hands–well, e-books can’t do that.

I really do believe that e-books and real books can coexisit, and I think the implications of e-books for authors may actually turn out to be pretty cool. It’s amazingly easy to self-publish with Amazon now, and some people are actually making big bucks doing it. So it might be bad news for publishers, but it’s good for authors, and–in my opinion–it’s not going to be quite the apocalypse for printed books that Franzen predicts. Projects like Grantland Quarterly show that people will actually pay for print, if they’re getting something that’s beyond what they’d get from an e-book, in terms of design, innovation, or beautiful illustrations. If anything, I think e-readers may drive a renaissance for print, forcing publishers to be creative and make books that provide a visual, tactile experience that e-books really can’t.

Then again, I didn’t write Freedom and that book was seriously so good I wanted to barf, so what do I know.

Standard